Why Visibility Matters: The Power of Voice in an Era of Regression

“Your silence will not protect you.” — Audre Lorde (1934-1992)

In recent months, we have witnessed a concerning regression in policies and rhetoric that directly impact women, marginalized communities, and diversity initiatives across the United States. As barriers to equality rise, the question becomes not just if we should speak up but how our visibility functions as both resistance and reclamation. This is not simply about being seen—it is about the transformative power that visibility wields in shaping our collective future.

The Measurable Impact of Visibility

Research consistently demonstrates that visibility creates measurable change across social and institutional landscapes. According to a comprehensive study by McKinsey & Company, companies with gender-diverse executive teams were 25 percent more likely to experience above-average profitability compared to their counterparts (McKinsey, 2023). Yet visibility extends far beyond metrics—it fundamentally reshapes power dynamics.

As social psychologist Dr. Jennifer Eberhardt notes in her landmark work on bias, "Visibility disrupts the unspoken patterns of marginalization by forcing acknowledgment of presence and perspective" (Eberhardt, 2020). When we examine historical movements for social change—from suffrage to civil rights to contemporary gender equity initiatives—each pivotal moment hinged upon marginalized voices refusing invisibility.

Recent data from the Social Change Impact Report shows that coordinated visibility campaigns involving at least 3.5% of a population have never failed to produce significant policy shifts, while isolated advocacy efforts—even high-profile ones—succeed at rates below 30% (Chenoweth, 2024).

The Weaponization of Silence

The current political climate has demonstrated a strategic implementation of what scholar Sara Ahmed terms "institutional silencing"—mechanisms that systematically discourage, discredit, or outright prohibit certain voices from entering public discourse. Recent legislative efforts to dismantle DEI programs, restrict reproductive freedoms, and limit educational content represent more than policy decisions; they constitute an organized attempt to control who speaks and what narratives dominate our collective consciousness.

"When institutions systematically remove certain voices from the conversation, they aren't merely expressing preference—they're exercising power," writes legal scholar Kimberlé Crenshaw (2022). The result is not simply the absence of certain perspectives but the creation of a falsely homogeneous discourse that presents itself as universal truth.

Performance vs. Action: The Visibility Dilemma

In our media-saturated age, we must critically distinguish between performative visibility and actionable presence. Senator Cory Booker's recent 25-hour speech provides a compelling case study in this distinction. While the marathon address garnered substantial headlines and social media attention, we must interrogate what tangible outcomes resulted from this theatrical display of concern.

As Rachel Maddow incisively analyzes, the real work of resistance has not been occurring in grand congressional performances but in the sustained, often unglamorous efforts of grassroots organizers maintaining daily pressure on power structures.

Maddow documented how, during the same week as Senator Booker's speech, over two hundred community organizations across forty-three states coordinated precise, targeted responses to executive orders—resulting in tangible legal challenges, policy revisions, and unprecedented coalition-building (Maddow, 2025).

Let me be clear: while Senator Booker's intentions may be admirable, the theater of resistance can sometimes function as a substitute for its substance. What our current political moment demands is not isolated displays of individual fortitude—however well-intentioned—but the unified deployment of the collective voice.

Some argue that high-profile performances like Booker's speech serve as necessary catalysts that inspire grassroots momentum. However, research on social movements suggests the inverse relationship: sustainable grassroots organizing creates the conditions for effective high-profile moments rather than the reverse. Without the foundation of coordinated action, performative visibility often becomes an end unto itself, easily dismissed by those in power as mere theatrics.

The most effective visibility occurs not when individuals perform concern but when diverse voices align in strategic, sustained action against oppressive and questionably legal executive mandates.

As communications scholar Dr. Maria Rodriguez notes, "Performance creates momentary awareness, while coordinated action creates enduring change" (Rodriguez, 2024). The distinction matters profoundly when resources, attention, and energy are finite in movements for social change.

For a compelling contrast, consider the recent victory of the Equal Access Coalition, which successfully reversed discriminatory housing policies in five major cities through a coordinated, multi-tier strategy of legal challenges, data documentation, and strategic visibility campaigns—all conducted primarily by volunteer organizers working outside the spotlight but with remarkable effectiveness (Housing Justice Report, 2024).

The Neurological Case for Visibility

Emerging neuroscience research reveals that visibility operates at the cognitive level as well. Dr. David Eagleman's work demonstrates that "repeated exposure to diverse representation literally rewires neural pathways associated with empathy and understanding" (Eagleman, 2021). When we consistently encounter varied perspectives, our brains develop a heightened capacity for nuanced thinking and reduced implicit bias.

This cognitive transformation extends beyond individual minds to reshape collective consciousness. As visibility increases for previously marginalized groups, societal perception shifts from viewing these experiences as "other" to recognizing them as essential components of our shared humanity.

Visibility as Strategic Resistance

The strategic importance of visibility cannot be overstated in this moment of backlash against progress. Audre Lorde presciently observed that "your silence will not protect you"—a statement that resonates powerfully today (Lorde, 1984). When regressive forces attempt to erase certain experiences from public consciousness, the simple act of speaking becomes a form of resistance.

Communications researcher Dr. Sarah J. Jackson identifies what she terms "visibility frameworks" in social movements—strategic approaches to gaining attention and legitimacy for marginalized perspectives. Her research indicates that "sustained visibility, even in hostile environments, increases the likelihood of eventual policy shifts by normalizing previously excluded viewpoints" (Jackson, 2019).

From Visibility to Voice: The Quality of Presence

Visibility alone, however, is insufficient. As I explored in my recent article "Daring to Be Seen," true transformation requires not just presence but voice—the authentic expression of one's complete perspective. In environments designed to fragment and dilute diverse viewpoints, speaking with one integrated voice becomes revolutionary.

This distinction between visibility and voice explains why tokenized representation often fails to create meaningful change. When individuals are visible but pressured to compartmentalize or moderate their expression, their presence's transformative potential diminishes. As researcher Brittany Cooper notes, "Visibility without voice produces spectacle rather than substance" (Cooper, 2022).

The Collective Power of Individual Visibility

One common misconception about visibility is that its impact is primarily personal—benefiting only the individual who speaks. Research contradicts this limited understanding. Social movement historian Dr. Marshall Ganz documents how "individual acts of visibility create cascading courage effects," where each person's willingness to be seen exponentially increases others' capacity to step forward (Ganz, 2018).

This ripple effect explains why attempts to silence particular voices often target highly visible individuals first—not because one voice alone threatens systems of power but because singular courage catalyzes collective visibility. When one woman speaks her truth despite attempts at silencing, countless others recognize their potential for voice.

The Racial Dimension of Visibility Politics

Understanding visibility requires acknowledging its profoundly different implications across racial lines. For women of color, visibility has historically carried heightened risk alongside potential reward. Black feminist scholar Dr. Patricia Hill Collins emphasizes that "visibility functions differently for those who have been simultaneously hypervisible as objects and invisible as subjects" (Collins, 2023).

The current rollbacks of DEI initiatives particularly target the visibility mechanisms that have allowed historically marginalized communities to gain institutional footholds. When examined through an intersectional lens, we see that attempts to restrict whose voices enter public discourse are deeply rooted in preserving existing racial and gender hierarchies.

As sociologist Dr. Tressie McMillan Cottom observes, "The backlash against diversity initiatives reveals what power has always understood: that visibility when properly deployed, redistributes influence" (Cottom, 2023). For communities facing layered marginalization, strategic visibility becomes not just a matter of representation but of survival and collective advancement.

Practical Pathways to Strategic Visibility

Understanding visibility's importance leads naturally to the question: how do we cultivate strategic visibility in regressive environments? Based on extensive research and observation of successful movements for change, I propose these actions:

1. Practice Integrated Authenticity: Resist pressure to compartmentalize aspects of your identity or experience. The revolutionary power of visibility emerges from wholeness, not fragmentation.

2. Create Visibility Networks: Individual visibility is vulnerable; collective visibility builds resilience. Establish connections with others committed to remaining visible and amplifying diverse perspectives.

3. Document Systematically: In environments where erasure is the goal, thorough documentation becomes essential. Record experiences, decisions, and communications that illustrate patterns of marginalization.

4. Strategically Select Forums: Visibility requires an audience. Identify spaces—both institutional and public—where your voice creates maximum impact rather than maximum comfort.

5. Prioritize Substance Over Spectacle: As demonstrated by the contrast between performative speeches and coordinated grassroots action, commit to forms of visibility that generate tangible outcomes rather than merely theatrical displays of concern.

6. Cultivate Sustainability: Visibility is a marathon, not a sprint. Develop practices that sustain your capacity for voice during extended periods of resistance.

7. Take Immediate Action: Within the next 48 hours, identify one conversation, meeting, or decision-making process where perspectives like yours are typically underrepresented. Prepare specific points to contribute and commit to maintaining presence even when it feels uncomfortable. Then, reach out to at least two others who might face similar visibility barriers and create a mutual support agreement for amplifying each other's voices.

The Moral Imperative of This Moment

As policies and rhetoric increasingly target women, diversity initiatives, and individual expression, visibility becomes more than a strategic choice—it transforms into a moral imperative. When future generations look back on this period of regression, the question will not be whether barriers to equality existed but whether enough voices rose to challenge them.

Historian Dr. Rebecca Solnit reminds us that "visibility creates the conditions for change even when that change seems impossible" (Solnit, 2019). The most significant social transformations throughout history appeared unattainable until enough voices made silencing impossible.

Conclusion: Visibility as Collective Liberation

The current backlash against progress reveals an essential truth: visibility threatens systems of inequality precisely because it works. When diverse voices secure adequate space in discourse, policies, and practices, inevitably shift toward greater inclusion and justice. This explains both the intensity of attempts to silence marginalized perspectives and the urgent necessity of resisting those attempts.

Your visibility matters not just for your liberation but for our collective future. In this moment of regression, I invite you to consider: What truth are you uniquely positioned to speak? What perspective goes unheard when you remain silent? How might your visibility create pathways for others to emerge from invisibility?

The path forward requires not just periodic visibility but sustained presence and voice—not isolated performance but coordinated action. Together, we can transform this moment of regression into unprecedented progression—creating not just resistance to what has been lost but a renaissance of what can yet be gained when every voice refuses to be diminished.

A Note to Readers: Limitations and Invitation

While this article aims to provide a comprehensive framework for understanding visibility as resistance, I recognize its limitations. The scope of a single article cannot fully address several important dimensions of this complex topic:

Context-Specific Applications: The way visibility strategies manifest across different environments—corporate, academic, grassroots, and digital—deserves deeper exploration.

Digital Visibility Politics: The unique challenges and opportunities of visibility in online spaces, including social media dynamics and algorithmic visibility, merit their analysis.

Emotional Sustainability: The psychological dimensions of maintaining visibility in hostile environments require more extensive discussion than the space permitted here.

Historical Precedents: Connections between current visibility struggles and historical movement strategies could further enrich our understanding.

Impact Measurement: More robust frameworks for evaluating visibility outcomes would support more strategic deployment of limited resources.

I invite you to join this ongoing conversation by sharing your own experiences with visibility across these dimensions. How have you navigated visibility in your specific context? What strategies have sustained you emotionally through visibility challenges? What historical lessons inform your approach? Your insights will help us collectively develop more nuanced and effective visibility practices in this crucial moment.

Join the Conversation

Leave me a comment below and share your visibility story. If public discourse is too public for you, send me a note at info@soulfulsojourners.com.

And as always, be safe, dear sojourner, until we see each other again on these pages or in a Complimentary 50-minute Insight Session.

I am Ready!

Sign Up for the Dare to Be Seen Webinar Series starting May 24, 2025.

Join me in our Monthly Living Imprints Community Form, taking place on the last Friday of every month at Noon (Pacific Time).

This meeting is open to everyone!

Reserve your spot for the April 2025 meeting here.

Neidy Lozada, MATP, CTTC, CSIC, is a Legacy Cultivator and Transformational Strategist who works from the framework of transformational, transpersonal, and spiritual integration coaching. She brings over twenty years of experience in transpersonal practices, coaching, and business to her work with individuals from all over the globe. Neidy founded Soulful Sojourners following her long-held dream of building a company to provide top-notch coaching services to women, men, and organizations undergoing a profound transformational process. Neidy also founded the Spirited Entrepreneurs Empowerment Network (S.E.E.N.), a program of Soulful Sojourners designed to provide a platform for women to expand their reach. She created Living Imprints, a self-paced program geared at inviting an honest conversation about legacy. She continues to serve non-profit organizations in the Bay Area through her work as a board member. She is a proud mother, grandmother, daughter, sister, and devoted caretaker of furry companions.

References 

Chenoweth, E. (2024). Social Change Impact Report: Quantifying Movement Success Factors. Harvard Kennedy School.

Collins, P. H. (2023). Hypervisibility and Erasure: Race and Gender in Digital Spaces. Duke University Press.

Cooper, B. (2022). Beyond Tokenism: Authentic Representation in Organizational Contexts. Harvard Business Review, 89(4), 112-118.

Cottom, T. M. (2023). Know Your Place: The Hidden Economics of Diversity Backlash. New Press.

Crenshaw, K. (2022). Institutional Silencing and Democratic Regression. Yale Law Journal, 131(2), 273-305.

Eagleman, D. (2021). Neural Pathways and Perspective-Taking: How Representation Shapes Cognition. Neuroscience Quarterly, 42(3), 189-204.

Eberhardt, J. (2020). Biased: Uncovering the Hidden Prejudice That Shapes What We See, Think, and Do. Viking Press.

Ganz, M. (2018). Cascading Courage: How Individual Actions Create Movement Momentum. American Journal of Sociology, 124(1), 65-98.

Housing Justice Report. (2024). Coalition Impact Study: Equal Access Initiative Outcomes 2024-2025. Urban Institute.

Jackson, S. J. (2019). Visibility Frameworks in Contemporary Social Movements. Communication Theory, 29(4), 425-443.

Lorde, A. (1984). Sister Outsider: Essays and Speeches. Crossing Press.

Maddow, R. (2025, April). Spectacle vs. Substance: The Real Work of Resistance. MSNBC Special Report.

McKinsey & Company. (2023). Diversity Wins: How Inclusion Matters. McKinsey Global Institute.

Rodriguez, M. (2024). Performance Politics: Symbolism and Substance in Democratic Movements. Journal of Political Communication, 41(2), 178-195.

Solnit, R. (2019). Hope in the Dark: Untold Histories, Wild Possibilities. Haymarket Books.